GershonMedia

Digital Media Strategy

48 notes

mediahascookies:

bliptv:

New conference room signs! These are getting installed today at our New York office. They’re the names of our favorite watering holes from our favorite TV shows. I can’t wait to hold a meeting in the Regal Beagle, or prank call someone while they’re working at Moe’s. Which one’s your favorite?
(Yes we named the restroom next to the conference rooms too… didn’t want it to feel left out!)

This makes me want to work at Bliptv

mediahascookies:

bliptv:

New conference room signs! These are getting installed today at our New York office. They’re the names of our favorite watering holes from our favorite TV shows. I can’t wait to hold a meeting in the Regal Beagle, or prank call someone while they’re working at Moe’s. Which one’s your favorite?

(Yes we named the restroom next to the conference rooms too… didn’t want it to feel left out!)


This makes me want to work at Bliptv

(via evangotlib)

0 notes

Will the cable bundle survive?

Unwanted Cable Channels Bloat Customer Bills, CEO Says

By Alex Sherman - May 23, 2012

Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC) Chief Executive Officer Glenn Britt says not everything on cable is worth watching.

“There are too many networks,” Britt said in an interview at the National Cable & Telecommunications Association annual cable show inBoston.

For years, U.S. cable carriers have provided TV in large chunks, pushing up the average monthly price to about $80 as even the cheapest packages have ballooned to include hundreds of channels. The increase in the number of little-watched channels, which content providers often sell to cable companies only in bundles with more popular networks, is causing cable bills to rise without any customer benefit, Britt said.

“There are a lot of general-interest networks that have lower viewership, and the industry would take cost out of the system if they shut those networks down and offered lower prices to consumers,” he said. “The companies involved would make just as much money as they do now because of the costs.”

Content providers, including Walt Disney Co. (DIS)Viacom Inc. (VIAB)Discovery Communications Inc. (DISCA) and AMC Networks Inc., structure deals with cable carriers that bundle many of their networks together. To get AMC, with popular shows such as “Mad Men” and “The Walking Dead,” pay-TV companies also need to buy AMC Networks (AMCX)’ IFC, Sundance Channel and WE tv.

That structure allows the content providers to boost the number of households that receive the less-watched channels —on which the networks then sell advertising and receive carriage fees from pay-TV operators. Many customers wouldn’t subscribe to those less-popular networks if they were able to pay separately for each channel.

Increasing ‘Diversity’

Britt says the only way networks will be eliminated is if a “courageous” media CEO agreed to offer popular networks to cable providers without forcing them to pay for other channels that aren’t as highly watched. Britt didn’t name the networks he said should be shut down and said some stations with lower viewership are beneficial if they attract a loyal following.

Josh Sapan, CEO of AMC Networks, said he doesn’t believe there are too many networks because they enhance the diversity of thought and ideas.

“The growth of the cable TV industry has gone hand in hand with the diversity of networks out there,” Sapan said in an interview. “Certain networks that may have been thought to be niche have, over time, proven to be potent and popular.”

It’s important to give networks the time to evolve, said Sapan, citing AMC’s progression from airing old movies to featuring Emmy-award-winning dramas such as “Mad Men” and “Breaking Bad.”

Time Warner Cable, the second-largest U.S. cable provider, fell 0.6 percent to $75.74 at the close in New York.

‘Bloated’

Coleman Breland, the chief operating officer of Time Warner Inc. (TWX)’s Turner Network Sales, agreed with Britt and said networks like his own should begin to rethink the issue. Time Warner Cable was spun off from Time Warner in 2009.

“The elevator’s full, there’s no more room,” Breland said. “It’s something content providers have to deal with. The system is bloated.”

Basic cable customers must navigate through hundreds of channels even if they watch only 10 or 15, a problem American Cable Association president Matthew Polka says he’s been fighting for years.

“It used to be that programmers sold on the merits of the substance of their channels,” Polka said. “Now that so many programmers are large conglomerates, customers lose choice.”

Usage-Based Pricing

Time Warner Cable, based in New York, is working on an improved user interface with better search functionality to help customers navigate through programs, Britt said. The new guide may be available by the end of the year, he said.

Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), the largest U.S. cable provider, will introduce a Web-connected TV guide May 30 in Boston and make it available in hundreds of thousands of households this year.

Another way to lower customers’ bills is to offer usage- based pricing for services such as Internet access, Britt said. The company is already letting light Internet users in southern Texas pay for broadband by the amount they consume. Customers that use less than 5 gigabytes a month — the equivalent of streaming two high-definition full-length movies — save $5 on their bill by opting out of an unlimited plan.

Time Warner Cable may eventually offer many pricing tiers, on the basis of the amount of data consumed, though an unlimited option will also remain an option for consumers, Britt said. Julius Genachowski, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, yesterday reiterated his support for usage-based pricing.

Britt also said Time Warner Cable may make another acquisition in the managed Internet-services business to enhance its business-services division. The company purchased NaviSite Inc. last year to help support e-mail, data security and storage capability for business customers.

To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Sherman in New York at asherman6@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Nick Turner at nturner7@bloomberg.net

Filed under ncta cable timewarner scripps gershonmedia

1 note

AdAge: Are Online Video Ads Wasting Your Time?

 

ARE ONLINE VIDEO ADS WASTING YOUR TIME?

Consumers Don’t Like Being Forced to Do Things, But That’s What We’re Doing In Video

Benjamin Franklin once said, “Lost time is never found again.” And that couldn’t be truer as time has never been more valuable. In an increasingly digital world – as we move from one site, app and connected device to another – time is of the essence, even in 15 and 30-second bites.

We measure the value of digital activity in part by the time it takes to complete an action. We’ve always cringed at the thought of valuable time lost over waiting in line or sitting through a bad movie. And today we scrutinize the slightest digital exercise if it takes us 90 seconds off our navigational course.

Watching online videos has become a mainstay for most of us, yet our content is often accompanied by time-consuming video ads. In fact, in March, 181 million U.S. Internet viewers watched 8.3 billion video ads,according to comScore. At 15 to 30 seconds a pop, that’s a lot of time spent that we can’t get back. Well, maybe in that time the Mets might finally win another World Series! With many ads lacking any meaningful personal relevance, after a while we can become desensitized to the whole thing.

Of course, this assumes that each of those video ads was viewed in its entirety, which is where we have a problem. Consumers generally don’t like being forced to do anything, especially being forced to watch ads. We know this, but in an industry that doesn’t lack for innovation, we’ve yet to come up with an alternative to the 15- or 30-second pre-roll that many consumers see as nothing more than an obtrusive time delay.

If one in four viewers bails, why not give consumers a choice by providing the option to skip? It’s not a novel concept. There are delay-reducing conveniences all around us. Think EZ Pass, DVRs, Priority Boarding or Express Mail. Consumers have long been paying a little extra for the convenience to speed things up.

But rarely does the union between advertiser and video publisher take the consumer’s best interest seriously. Imagine a paid or earned skip model for consumers that helps advertisers reduce media waste and improve performance by lowering abandonment rates. Imagine if advertisers could receive credits for all would-be impressions that are skipped, access new forms of data (who’s skipping, what time of day are they skipping, what type of content is yielding higher skips) and create a natural brand affinity due to the positive association with a skip-enabled pre-roll?

If publishers can earn as much if not more from consumer skips than they do from the pre-roll ads that play while satisfying both advertiser and consumer at the same time, then why not give the consumer a choice? Everyone benefits, with the possible exception of the video ad networks, and surely those guys recognize the benefits of this model to advertisers, publishers and consumers.

Will consumers pay to skip pre-roll ads? It’s hard to say. But even if five percent of the video ad consuming public were paying regularly to skip, that would be five percent more than ever before. It’s all about choice - the choice to preserve time for a small price.

Now that time has a quantifiable currency online, it won’t be long before consumers will be able to earn skips by answering a survey, downloading a coupon, viewing a piece of long-form branded content, subscribing to a newsletter, liking a brand on Facebook and any of a few dozen other possibilities. For consumers who would rather not pay to skip ads, redeeming a relevant offer or engaging in some way with the brand in exchange for a collection of skips is a fair alternative. Publishers would still get the same high returns for each skip, and marketers are engaged in a dialogue with consumers that can provide much deeper insights.

Various sources have pre-roll abandonment rates ranging from 15% to 40 %. Imagine having access to data that reveals, among other things, when creative burnout takes place? Think that might eventually lead to improved creative? Imagine shorter pre-roll ads that are relevant and entertaining at the same time.

This is a pretty controversial topic in the industry right now and I am not sure who the winners and losers will be. But, I am certain there are better models than forcing consumers to watch ads they do NOT want to see! What do you think?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bernard Gershon is the President of GershonMedia, which provides advisory services to digital media enterprises, and serves on the advisory boards of top digital companies in the mobile and online video space, including Boxee, Fwix, Row44 and Woozworld. He also serves on the board of SpotXchange. Follow him on Twitter @bgershon

Filed under @spotxchange @skipit gershonmedia videoads

1 note

Amazing escape from river of cement at Le Parker Meridien!

Thanks for the tweets, texts, calls, e-mails, etc… I’m fine following my bizarre experience — having my coffee with a friend from LA interrupted by shattering glass, breaking walls and a cascade of wet cement in the lobby of the Parker Meridien hotel yesterday.  

Some media clips below.   The picture of the cement flowing in the hotel lobby was taken with my iPhone 4S.  

New York Post  4/19/2012 - Mortar-fying!

New York Times 4/19/2012  Wet Concrete Floods Hotel Cafe

News4NY 4/18/2012

HuffingtonPost  4/18/2012

Gothamist   4/18/2012

Real Deal   4/18/2012

New York Observer  4/23/2012 

Filed under cement gershonmedia leparkermeridien weirdnews